![]() |
Logo of Working for Water. |
The government saw in one problem the solution for many others. Poverty, personal formation and social inequality are points which the program also works. The method of rotational vacancy makes people with experience and personal formation, considering that one person who start to work without experience starts to gain it at Working for Water and after years give the vacancy to a new untrained. Then, those that worked for Working for Water can work in other places/ lands, now with experience.
More information at Working for water website: http://www.dwaf.gov.za/wfw/
Or in this article that I didn't find author but it was essential to understand the program:
http://www.unep.org/training/programmes/Instructor%20Version/Part_3/readings/WfW_case.pdf
Works cited:
Courtenay, W. R. & Williams, J.D. 1992. Dispersal of exotic species from aquaculture sources, with emphasis on freshwater fishes.
Mack, R., Simberloff, D., Lonsdale, M., Evans, H., Clout, M., & Bazzaz, F. 2000. Biotic invasions: causes, epidemiology, global consequences and control. Ecological Application 10, 689-710.
Often, the establishment of programmes with particular aims can lead to a diversity of benefits. I’m interested in knowing a bit more about how this programme works in the control of invasive species. Does it target both animals and plants, or is it more focused on one group? What type of success has this project had in terms of successful invasive species eradication?
ReplyDeleteIt is more focused in Plants and according to this second article from UNEP more than 2 million hectares of invaded lands have been cleared by TWW.
Delete